Research Question: This study explores how civil society in Afghanistan has adapted and sustained itself in the face of extremist governance under the uncivil society structures the Taliban has sought to impose. It seeks to understand the strategies used by civil society actors to navigate the constraints of authoritarianism and maintain and develop their roles in promoting social cohesion and human rights. Thesis Statement: Drawing on the concepts of third space (Chamberlain, 1940; Van Til, 2008), collaborative commons (Rifkin, 2014), and new commons (Lohmann, 2015), this research argues that civil society in Afghanistan has evolved innovative approaches to operate within and beyond traditional structures. Despite facing repression, civil society remains a vital force for social change and resistance to extremist ideologies. Through an analysis of intermediary structures and third spaces, this research highlights the innovative strategies employed by civil society actors to sustain their activities and influence within a repressive environment. Methodology: This qualitative study utilizes a literature review, expert interviews, and analysis of primary sources such as social media and organizational documents. Well established practices of civil society are contrasted with “dark side” (Cf. D. H. Smith, 2016) policies of uncivil society (Gross and Kotkin, 2009). These frameworks guide the analysis of how civil society in Afghanistan operates within and beyond traditional organizational boundaries. Data Sources: • Reports from international organizations, NGOs, and human rights groups in Afghanistan. • Online publications and social media of Afghan civil society organizations. • Interviews with key actors countering extremism in Afghanistan. • Academic research on civil society in conflict zones. Research and Results: Preliminary findings suggest that civil society in Afghanistan has undergone significant transformations in response to the Taliban regime. While some organizations have been forced to operate clandestinely or suspend their activities, others have adapted by leveraging digital technologies and forming strategic alliances with international partners. The research will delve into specific case studies and examples to illustrate these dynamics and provide a nuanced understanding of civil society's resilience in the face of extremism. Conclusions and Recommendations: The findings of this research are expected to contribute to the body of knowledge on civil society dynamics in conflict-affected environments and offer insights for policymakers, practitioners, and civil society actors working in similar contexts. By highlighting the innovative strategies and challenges faced by civil society in Afghanistan, this study aims to inform strategies for supporting and strengthening civil society in the fight against extremism.