MESA Banner
Islam, Monarchy, and the Nation-State: Religious Authority, Royal Legitimacy, and the Amani-Kemalist Dialectic
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to reconsider the legacy of one of the most daring, polarizing, and arguably misunderstood Afghan rulers in modern history—Shah Amanullah Khan Muhammadzai (r. 1919-1929)—through the lens of a rare source attributed to his reign: a transcript of sermons he delivered in Qandahar in 1925. By providing a microhistory to the Amani period based on this largely unexamined text, I ask: what was Amir Amanullah seeking to accomplish in delivering these khutbehs? What new perspectives can they impart about his style of rule, the social and legal reforms embodied in his reforms, and how the amir framed them to the people of Qandahar at the midpoint of his decade-long reign? Finally, what can they tell us about Amanullah’s model of leadership and rule as compared—and contrasted—to Kemalism? While the Amani reforms of 1919-1929 have long been attributed to Kemalist mimcry in light of Amanullah’s friendship with the Turkish Republic’s founder, this paper attempts to uncover a neglected feature of Amanullah’s reformist project: how he presented them to his own people. It argues that while Amanullah Khan advocated social change through top-down legal engineering, he was adamant to stress his reforms were a legitimate interpretation of the shari‘a, and specifically within Hanafi jurisprudential perimeters, thereby tackling modern state-building challenges from a purportedly authentic (and certainly nationalized) Afghan juridical corpus. In contrast to developments in Republican Turkey, Amani Afghanistan’s version of a Muslim nation-state and monarchy stressed continuity with predominantly Hanafi religio-legal orthodoxy in the country, rather than blistering rupture.
Discipline
History
Geographic Area
Afghanistan
Ottoman Empire
Turkey
Sub Area
None