MESA Banner
Subordinating Religion to the State: How Institutions Shape Islam

Panel 298, 2016 Annual Meeting

On Sunday, November 20 at 2:00 pm

Panel Description
The salience of religion around the world seems to negate the "secularization thesis" the idea that religion would become obsolete as societies modernized. The power of religion to motivate political and social action has received particular attention among Muslim populations. In Muslim majority societies, the state has played a significant role in shaping the religious arena, yet existing research tends to focus on Islamists and on Islamization as a grassroots phenomenon. This panel focuses instead on state actions, responding to the call to "bring the state back in" to the study of Islam and politics. As a component of state-building, newly modernizing Muslim states absorbed religious institutions such as schools, mosques, and universities that were historically financed through independent religious endowments. In the process, the state became responsible for the production of religious education, the administration of religious spaces, and the regulation of religious discourse. In the present context of "radical Islamic terrorism" the state uses its control of these and other institutions to increasingly impose a specific version of permitted religious practice. The condoned form of official Islam is often framed in reference to historic practices and beliefs specific to the national territory in question, and tends to emphasize the ways in which the local practice of Islam is "moderate" or "tolerant" in contrast to interpretations of Islam linked with violence, which the state labels as "foreign" and "inauthentic." In the process, independent religious practice is increasingly framed as a threat to security, and suppressed. The papers compare efforts by different states to promote the condoned form of Islam, whether through the promotion of "moderate Islam," the production and regulation of religious space through mosque building, or state efforts to redefine the condoned form of Islam. The panel's scope extends outside the Arab Middle East to consider patterns of state regulation of Islam in Turkey and Azerbaijan, both contexts that underwent forceful secularization and are currently experiencing a resurgence in the salience of Islam. The panel is motivated by questions about the subordination of religion to state goals, and the effect this has on individuals' perception of legitimate interpretations of the faith.
Disciplines
Political Science
Participants
  • Dr. Jocelyne Cesari -- Discussant
  • Prof. Murat Somer -- Presenter
  • Annelle Sheline -- Organizer, Presenter
  • Dr. Anar Valiyev -- Presenter
Presentations
  • Annelle Sheline
    Can government efforts to promote moderate Islam reduce violence, or otherwise serve as an antidote to intolerant interpretations of Islam? Is it possible that if disaffected populations associate moderate Islam with an unpopular government, the idea of moderation will itself be discredited? In the wake of 9/11, the association of “Islam” with “terrorism” in the American imagination led some commentators to the notion of so-called “moderate Islam,” in an effort to distinguish the majority of Muslims from the tiny minority of radical extremists. Yet Middle Eastern regimes soon sought to capitalize on America’s search for “moderate Islam,” and institutions, conferences, and organizations dedicated to promoting so-called moderate Islam now proliferate: but do they have the intended effect of reducing intolerance? The paper examines how populations react to the endorsement of moderate Islam by their authoritarian leaders. Based on interviews with government officials, clerics, teachers, and young people, the paper compares evidence from the Gulf (Oman), the Levant (Jordan), and North Africa (Tunisia). Initial findings reveal that respondents view moderate Islam as overtly politicized and not true to Muslim doctrine, merely the naked expression of regime agendas. However the paper examines other circumstances in which populations have incorporated ideas of toleration into their conception of Islam as well as their national identity. The paper concludes that path dependence, state capacity, and timing have an inordinate effect on the ability of the state to shape the religious beliefs of inhabitants.
  • Prof. Murat Somer
    Based on the conceptualization of “moderation” as compromise with a country’s political center, this paper will show how the notion of moderate Islam changed in Turkey as political power shifted since the early 2000s. In early 2000s, a political party rooted in “moderate Islamism” came to power in Turkey: the Justice and Development Party (AKP). At that time, moderate Islamism was presented and perceived as compatible with modern society, secular state-friendly, but without ambitions for state-engineered reshaping of social and political order. As the AKP’s grip on power became consolidated and the party turned into a hegemonic party, however, moderate Islam increasingly became defined as a blueprint for state-led social engineering and recreation od modern Islamic society.
  • Dr. Anar Valiyev
    The fall of the Soviet Union and collapse of communist ideology has played a significant role in the transformation of Azerbaijani society. The country was slowly recovering from a seventy year old totalitarian regime, and began to enjoy the benefits of free soci-ety. Transformation, however, did also bring many problems. Thanks to its favorable geographical location – between Iran and Turkey and sharing a border with volatile Dagestan republic-, weak law-enforcement agencies, gaps in legislation as well as fast spreading of globalization, Azerbaijan became target of religious and radical movements vying for influence. Moreover, the existence of Islamic State in Syria and Iraq became attracting point for many young disenfranchised people. The following paper would discuss the challenges of religious revival in the country and problems of radicalisation in society in post-Soviet environment